A claimant files a worker's compensation claim. Employer moves for summary judgment, arguing that the claim is untimely because the claimant filed it more than two years after discovering his injury was work-related. The Employer's own motion (which included the claimant's hearing testimony ) showed the claimant may have filed a timely claim. Claimant files no response to the motion. What happens?
The Circuit Court dismissed the case because, it held, filing a written response to a motion for summary judgment is mandatory.
The Court of Special Appeals reverses finding the even if a claimant fails to respond to a summary judgment motion, a Court still must analyze whether the moving party met its burden of proving the absence of a disputed material fact.
Despite this decision, it is obviously prudent to file a written opposition to a motion for summary judgment.